Pages

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Obama is a god

We are experiencing trying times.  Law enforcement officers are shot on the job.  Horrible, scary events that should never happen.  Unarmed men and women are shot by police.  Horrible, scary events that should never happen.  We see all this as a new problem.  It is not.  We have had separate but unequal races in this country for generations.  More of one race in prison.  More of one race dies via gunshot wounds.  More of one race experiences unemployment.  More of one race in colleges.  More of one race teaching in the classrooms.  More of one race in law enforcement.  We are lopsided.  We can scream all day that these differences are due to the behaviors of one race more than another.  Perhaps.  But we should be screaming that we must stop judging people by skin pigment, hair style, holes poked in their bodies, ink injected under their skin, and the relationship between their belly buttons and the top of their pants.  (I have contended all along that if teenage girls simply laughed at and refused to date any teenage boy who allowed his underwear to show above his belt the fad would disappear quickly.)

The problems are huge, both races have responsibilities.  Both races have tough steps to take to fix it because both races must modify their culture and their beliefs to end the disparity in data that confirms one race is treated differently and/or behaves differently than another.  That will be very hard.  Or so I thought.

Until I listened to my conservative friends.  Perhaps I should say my very conservative friends.  My moderately conservative friends and my liberal friends are not promoting the same message.  Just those folks on the far right.  Only they have seen the light.  And here is what they are saying.

The violence in our country is Obama’s fault.  Shooting police officers is Obama’s fault.  Increased racial tension is Obama’s fault.  Still no affordable universal health insurance is Obama’s fault.  Proliferation of semi-automatic rifles is Obama’s fault.  Probably sexual harassment at Fox News is Obama’s fault.  He caused it all.  He did it.  He is the villain!

If they are right, then Obama is God.  I have been praying to God to stop the violence, but Obama still made it happen.  I have been praying to God to stop senseless shootings of suspects and police, but Obama still made it happen.  Therefore I guess I should agree with my conservative friends that not only is Obama at fault, he is more powerful than we ever imagined.  More powerful than the god I followed.  It is time to worship Obama, pray to Obama, and ask him please to stop all the violence, all the killings.  If he caused it, he can stop it.  I am so surprised that enterprising right wingers have not marched out evidence of Obama’s deity status which should be easier for them to get than his birth certificate, and establish the Church of Obama, tax free. 

Why, now that we know Obama is a god the violence in France must be his fault too!  In fact, violence everywhere must be his doing.  Intolerance of other races everywhere must be his fault too!  Even global warming must be his fault. 


Yes dear conservatives, such a powerful deity merits our awe and respect.  Thank you for enlightening me.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Deplorables?

Clinton has ignited a lot of discussion this week identifying some Trump supporters as "Deplorables."  I disagree with Hillary.  The people, the human beings, that support Trump cannot be deplorable by definition.  However, they can hold deplorable beliefs and deplorable attitudes that inspire deplorable behaviors.  They carry the cancers that are eating away at our culture and I wish I knew the cure.  I have spoken to this issue already and re-post that piece from May of this year.  (At the time I wrote this piece I chose "cancer" as my metaphor for the diseases carried via the beliefs some hold.  Had I written it today I would have used STD's because if Trump is elected and institutes his vitriol we will all get screwed and thereby get sick.)

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Trump Metastasizes Cultural Cancers

Donald Trump has secured the number of Republican delegates to become the Republican nominee for President of the United States.  Wow.  Trump could be our next President.  If so, I believe our nation will survive.  However, I believe we will do an about face on the march to a healthier nation, a better nation, a world leader, and a nation that stands for what is right.  We would become a sick nation if Trump were elected President.  I am aghast that so many do not see this.  Or perhaps it is not that so many do not see it, it is that so many want to endorse and spread the diseases Trump promotes.  I will use the term cultural cancers to attempt to capture the nature of those diseases.  Diseases that make us weak and make us sick.

But before that, we need to discuss the attributes of a healthy national culture.  As I think about America I want a nation of people who value diversity.  People who do not discriminate based on any variable that is determined at birth including gender, sexual preference, gender identity, race, and ethnicity.  I picture a nation where people do not discriminate based on many attributes that are self-selected such as religious preference, hair color, addictions and weight.  I picture a nation of people who promote and protect the minority, the underdog, knowing that God does not make junk.  I picture a nation of people who stand for justice, who do not shoot from the hip, who do not judge at first glance, and who respect the law and the peacekeepers.  I picture a nation of people who are positive, open, welcoming and free of fear.  I picture a nation of people who are generous to all who are in need whether they are our own or are victims abroad.  I picture a nation where protecting your rights means more to me than implementing my beliefs in law.  I picture a nation of people who value the arts, creativity, knowledge and learning.  I picture a nation of people who understand that by protecting industries such oil and guns that we are hurting everyone and are spreading cancers.  I picture a nation where human beings mean more than wealth accumulation.  I picture a nation where the people know that we should judge our success by the fate and status of the least among us.  And I picture a nation who will stand for democracy and human rights abroad.  Those are attributes of a healthy culture and a culture where I would want to live.

But cultures can be sick, can be cancerous.  The cancers I fear in our culture are those attributes that are the antithesis of those listed above.  Discrimination, prejudice in any form is a cancer.  Insistence that my way is the right way is a cancer.  Demanding that my religious beliefs entitle me to discriminate, to judge, to damn others and demanding that such beliefs whatever they are become the law of the land.  Believing that building walls against other human beings based on geography and damning other human beings based on religious belief is a good thing.  It is not.  It is a cancerous belief.  Promoting strategies that help those who need it the least at the expense of those who need it the most is cancerous.  Promoting industries that are resulting in untold deaths and untold damages to our planet is cancerous.  Promoting fear to attain power is a cancer.  Promoting ignorance rather than knowledge is cancerous.  Promoting my way of thinking by attacking others is a cancer.  Sending the message that self-service and self-defense are superior to serving and defending others is a cancer.

You will likely not agree with everything I have listed both healthy and cancerous.  But those are my beliefs.  In a healthy culture it will be OK for me to have those beliefs and I will not merit assault.  Our culture grows ill if we attack folks with differing beliefs.

Given all that, Donald Trump is not promoting the attributes that I believe would make our nation healthier, happier and better.  He is promoting the spread of cancerous beliefs.  From his views of women, Mexicans, Muslims, the families of terrorists, foreign policy, gun accessibility and wealth accumulation he is metastasizing cancer in our national body.  It is my fervent hope that enough Americans see what Trump represents, rejects those notions, and when those Americans go to the polls in November they opt to stop the spread of cancers.


How do we stop promoting the spread of such cancers?  I do not believe chemotherapy will work.  Drinking more scotch will not make him go away.  It is going to take surgical amputation.  Such amputation is only accomplished by thoughtful educated voters.  This fall, please amputate the cancer.

Monday, September 12, 2016

Ambition and Integrity

Ambition.  The desire to get more, have more, rise higher, and improve one’s status and prestige and power.  A subset of ambition is a high sense of competition.  Most folks believe that people do not become CEO’s, governors, presidents, school superintendents, etc. without at least some detectable amount of ambition in their composition.  I see it clearly in Trump and clearly in Clinton.  That drive to excel, to be the alpha, to be the boss, to control, to be on top is very near the surface in both these candidates.  I have seen it very clearly in many of the educators I have worked with, especially administrators.

Integrity.  The commitment to do what is right, to tell the truth, to do no harm to any other, to honor and serve humanity.  Most folks believe that people do not become teachers, nurses, preachers, social workers, or counselors without a detectable amount of integrity in their composition.  I have seen it clearly in many of my fellow church members, in my fellow educators, especially teachers.  That drive to serve, to stand for what is best in all of humanity, to make lives of others better, and to do so with humility is near the surface in the folks we know who have integrity.

So my query is, can one have both ambition and integrity?  I am not so sure.

Among other activities I was in the band in high school.  I played the clarinet.  I loved playing in the band, I loved knowing I was a part of something bigger, something beautiful.  I really did not care about competition with fellow band members, I cared about the sound we were making together.  I sat first chair, placed there by an audition everyone took at the beginning of school.  The band director placed us based on our musicality and technical skill.  Deanie was second chair.  She was very competitive and felt from the beginning that she should have been first chair.  I did not care, first chair and second chair played the same music.  So after a couple of weeks of her loud sighs and deep moans, and what appeared to be real joy on her part when I missed a note or a beat, I asked her if she would really like to be first chair.  She said “yes.”  I said it was OK with me, and the next day when we walked into band Deanie sat first chair and I sat second chair.  My role in the band had not changed, my music had not changed, but I had won a new friend.  Deanie was all over herself thanking me.  The director came in and rehearsal started.  Suddenly he stopped and pointed out that Deanie and I were not sitting in our assignment chairs.  I told him that I had told Deanie she could be first chair, I did not care.  The director blew up and called us both in his office.  

His complaint was that he will make all chair decisions and he did not want anyone in his band who did not have the desire to improve.  I told him I had taken private lessons since 6th grade, I practiced at least an hour each night, and I was fully aware that I was the best in the section, and that improving my ability to play the clarinet was very important to me, but that where I sat did not matter to me.  He blew up and asked me to leave the band.  I packed up my instrument, grabbed my books and went to the counselor to have my schedule changed, never again to play the clarinet or perform or march with the band.  And though I had been all region in band and won numerous UIL solo and ensemble awards, I was done.  I was re-assigned to speech and debate, and two years later won the state debate competition and oratory competition.  If there is competition someone wins and someone loses.  I had a great time in band and a great time in speech and debate.  The band director lost because he was so full of ambition and competition that he could not relinquish control.  He could not even picture making a decision for the greater good even if it meant self-sacrifice.

I have watched parents at little league games, boys and girls, football, baseball, softball; and parents of integrity regarding their kids in most settings become ambitious monsters if they believe their child has somehow been slighted, or has not been given enough playing time, or someone is picking on them, etc..  How many videos of fights at little league games do we have to watch to see ambition blinding reason.  When the desire to be the best at any cost drives our ambition, then we are willing to sacrifice even the most fundamental rules of human interaction to have our way.

I have seen parents of school children verbally assault school employees because they wanted something special for their kids.  Usually they could not recognize that universal fairness eliminates special treatment.  In cases of unusual needs, special treatment is warranted, but not because the parent perceives his or her kid to be gifted or somehow immune to the rules everyone else is asked to follow.  Such parents’ ambition for their kids blinds them to the integrity incumbent in any group setting.

I worked for 19 years in a Houston school district.  I had many roles from campus to central office leadership positions.  One weekend the superintendent, who was mad at one of us on the executive director level, re-assigned all of us by simply rotating executive directors from their current job to someone else’ job.  I ended assigned to take the job of a woman who loved program evaluation and assessment.  I would hate that job.  She was assigned to elementary instruction, and she hated that job.  My best friend was bumped from leading secondary instruction to staff development.  I could not remain in a system that advocated collaborative decision making, advocated involving the participants in decisions if the decisions affected them, and advocated everyone working in an area of their own interest while behind the scenes people were moved like pawns with no consultation or involvement.  I quit.  So did a dear friend who was moved to staff development.  She was most hurt by all of this and I could not tolerate such.  Ever since, I have watched the overly ambitious accept jobs at the expense of others, somehow rationalizing that if it is good for them it must be good. No, to accept a position that requires someone else who is competent to leave what they love is the epitome of high ambition and low integrity.  People of integrity would recognize what the system must value to effect such a change and leave that system.  I did.  Do no harm applies to others, not one’s self.

Through all the pain and agony and death and anger of 9/11 the only real joy was the unification of the citizens of this country, however brief, toward the same goals.  We honored first responders, those in the military, families who had lost loved ones, and stood in awe and celebration of individual self-sacrifice for the good of others.  Our definition of heroes changed. Heroes were now people of integrity.  They were not people of ambition.

I know that people of ambition tend to earn more money and sit in seats with greater power.   Or so it seems.  But for the rest of us working with or for people of ambition our respect drops substantially.  We most respect people who serve others more than self.  I am in shock every time I hear of a CEO getting a bonus while the company lays off workers.  There is no integrity in such a decision.  Only ambition. And any time someone tells you that they are the only one who can do it and that others are failures, it is an announcement of incredible ambition at the expense of integrity.  Any time a person’s list of accomplishments includes only those ventures that earned them more money or power they are not a person of integrity.  Give me a leader who strives if nothing else to do no harm.


So, I find it rare to see in any person an even balance of ambition and integrity.  When push comes to shove, people will jump either for self-service or service to others.  And in that jump we see their true colors.

Friday, September 2, 2016

Homework

Despite all we know we continue to assign kids homework.  I want to think that through with you and will do so via several scenarios.

I have just taught some brand new material and the kids did not have time to apply their new knowledge so I send them home to accomplish such an application.  Really?  You are willing for a kid to make a mistake with brand new material, a mistake that will take more time to un-teach than to teach?  You are willing to let the kid use trial and error, mom and dad, boyfriend and girlfriend to try to figure this stuff out?  I think you are nuts.  Don’t assign homework, and model and practice in class tomorrow.

I have just gone over a review of what will be on a major test in a few days.  I assign the kids a review sheet as homework to complete and turn in for a grade.  Really?  If the kids knows the stuff they will simply be frustrated doing busy work on content where they have already demonstrated mastery.  If the kids do not know it, completing a review sheet won’t teach it.  Or, if completing a review sheet could teach it, why not hand it out at the beginning of the unit and take a few days off.  Nope, if you want to be sure your kids know what they need before the test you have waited too late to find that out just a day or two before.  Don’t assign the homework and work on ways to spiral past knowledge into each lesson to keep previous learnings fresh.

I want to teach some content yet to be introduced so I assign the kids to read the next chapter and answer the questions at the end so they will be familiar with the content before I teach.  Really?  If that worked you do not need to teach.  Just let them read.  (This is the shortfall of many on-line courses.)  You would be so much better off to introduce the concepts and terminology yourself so that you know the kids have a good scaffold to build on from previous learning.  You waste their time asking them to read what they do not know. 

There are caveats to these scenarios.  If, for instance, I am introducing a literary form or process or characteristic it seems perfectly appropriate to ask the kids to read content prior to the class where you teach it.  You are not asking the kids to understand your form or process or characteristic.  You are providing background knowledge that it can become hooks to hang new knowledge on. 

Likewise, if I am introducing the philosopher John Locke it seems perfectly OK for kids to Google him before class so that we have rich resources to share when we discuss his influence on the USA.

Likewise, if a teacher wants the kids engaged is some sort of summative project, a research paper, a science fair project, a welding project, an art project or practice for a UIL musical event, etc., then assigning the bulk of that work to be done outside of class with careful monitoring during class makes sense to me.

Likewise, if I am a math teacher and math teachers just give homework every night then it seems – no wait a minute – that seems like a total waste of every one’s time.  If the kid knows it there is little reason to practice.  If they do not know it practicing won’t help.  If they can teach themselves how to solve the problems what the heck are we paying you for?

In other words, most of the homework assignments I have observed over the past 40 years have been a total waste of time and energy.  Do not tell me you are teaching kids responsibility.  Especially if you use some kind of punitive system for those who blew-off, forgot or whose canine consumed their homework.  If you are willing to practice such negative effects in the name of teaching responsibility just let me know and I will set up a punitive system for every day you are late to work, stay at lunch too long, leave campus without signing out, fail to turn in lesson plans on time, or forget your assigned duty.  If punishment works to teach responsibility by now all the teachers should be master models of responsibility, and we all know that is not always true.  Holding kids accountable for the completion of homework is rewarding or punishing a clerical task, not a learning task, and that is not what we should be teaching!

Homework does not work.  If it did, that is all we would ever need to do.  Let go of your urge to socialize kids with appropriate responsibility using homework as a tool.  Homework is a terrible tool to teach that skill or knowledge, and there are other tools so much more powerful.  If you are bogged down in grading make a list of the things you have learned about the kids’ knowledge from grading their homework.  You will learn individual attributes, but if the entire class save one can do it, there was no point in assigning it.  And vice-versa, if the entire class cannot do it save one, there was no point in assigning it.

I would posit one more ground rule.  Never assign a kid homework that you ignore, that you cannot do, or that you do not intend to grade.  Any of those no-no’s sends a quick message to kids that you really don’t care and the clerical is more important than real learning.  I believe deeply the same is true for any book a student reads.  If you have one of those ultra-expensive non-effective reading programs where kids read, take a test, get points, ad naseum then you better darn well have read every book they are reading and you better darn well be able to answer the questions on the computer.  If you do that you will quickly learn that some of those books merit classroom discussion, so wouldn’t it be nice if we all read the same book at the same time.  Last time I checked the only people who claim good results with these sorts of programs are hired by the authors and vendors of the programs.  Much like the only “scientists” who deny human influenced climate change are paid by oil companies.  Go figure.

OK.  I want you all to go home and think about this and write a 900 word response by tomorrow, with appropriate heading and use of APA style.

I don’t think the above assignment will help, do you?

How about, consider your homework assignments.  Can you confirm learning using another strategy?  Can you teach using another strategy?  Can you foster accountability using another strategy?  And it may come as a shock to some, but grades can be awarded for things other than paper.

I believe all your answers will be yes.


You get an A!  My work here is done.