Pages

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Trump Won. What Lost?

I love America.  I love democracy.  I firmly believe in the notion that the citizens of this nation speak at the polls and the majority rules.  But I also recognize that belief is based on the assumption of an educated electorate.  Trump won the election, and in doing so made clear to us not only who lost the election, but what lost in the election.  So this morning as I reel in shock and pain, these things are obvious to me:

  • Inexperience won over experience and expertise and knowledge.
  • Bigotry and prejudice won over civil liberties.
  • Fear won over reason.
  •  “Right” think and “right” belief won over pluralism, openness and support of diverse beliefs and thoughts.
  •  Anger won over understanding.
  •  Reprisal won over forgiveness.
  •  Dictatorial thinking won over democratic thinking.
  •  Isolationism won over global thinking.
  •  Past won over possible futures.
  •  The US government as our enemy won over the US government as protector of its citizens.
  •  Chauvinism won over liberation.
  •  False economic assumptions won over reality.
  •  Support for the few won over support for the many.
  •  False campaign claims won over the truth.
  •  Retreat won over progress.
  •  Ignorance won over enlightenment.
  •  Closed doors and hearts and minds won over open doors and hearts and minds.


The Trump Presidency begins in January with Republican control of both houses of congress.  For the next two years the full responsibility for the progress or failure of our nation, our economy, our standing in the world, and the status of the poorest among us lies at their feet.  We will learn, as we have so many times in the past, that such philosophy when implemented benefits the rich, hurts the poor, triggers global conflict, and accelerates immoral market tendencies over decency and human liberties.  I hope we are OK in two years and have a chance to fix the problems that are coming.  But that will be up to the voters.  Again.

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Two Donalds

You may remember Donald Sterling.  He was the owner of the Los Angeles Clippers.  In 2014 he was taped without his knowledge making racial slurs against African Americans.  These were not public statements.  These were statements made during an argument with his girlfriend.  When the tape got out it was labeled “scandalous”.  Sterling was fined $2.5 million dollars and ejected from professional basketball forever.  Wow. 

Donald Trump can stand at a public podium, covered by all available news sources, and intentionally make racial slurs, make slurs against women, make slurs against the disabled, etc.  He is not fined.  He is not banished from politics.  He is selected as the Republican nominee for President of the United States.


Times change.  Do values?

Monday, October 31, 2016

Clinton and Trump: Down to the Wire

The 2016 Presidential election ends next week.  None too soon for me.  I am sick of watching our nation tear itself apart over the most outlandish campaigns and candidates of the modern era.  This is one for the books and that book becomes the only one I would support burning.

We have a choice between a man who does not believe he can do anything wrong, say anything wrong or ever lose, and a woman who is very scared that someone might find out she did something wrong.  The man harkens back to a time as the model for future greatness that was a terrible time for anyone other than Anglo Americans with steady income and no disabilities.  The women dreams of a future time free of discrimination and rife with opportunity.  Their separate visions of the future are telling, and the model they would use to move toward their vision is equally telling.

Even when Trump was way behind in the polls his response was the polls are wrong.  Even when it appeared clear Clinton would win, he said if Clinton won the election must be rigged.  The man cannot fathom failure or misstep.  There is no compromise in him because he has never had to compromise.  He has never been put in a position other than the boss.  At the risk of being drafted, where he surely would not have been the boss, he dodged.  He does not want to be President as much as he believes he should be the boss of the USA.  He can insult anyone he wants because he is the boss.  He can assume any political or economic position he wants because he is the boss.  His model for male/female relationships was formed in the 1950’s when a woman’s place was in the home or on her back.

Clinton on the other hand has been shaped by the expansion of civil liberties in the 1960’s.  Women, children, minorities have all been the focus of her life’s work and work she has.  She is a Washington insider which may sound like a curse to many and a blessing to some.  She knows how to get things done.  But she carries baggage.  It is not the baggage of discrimination or misogyny, it is the baggage of mistrust arising from her emails, her handling of Benghazi while Secretary of State, and a bunch of random quotes taken out of context from speeches made years ago.  The American people are having a hard time forgiving her for lack of transparency while she claims to be the most transparent candidate. 

The main difference in the shortcomings of the two candidates is that Trump’s shortcomings are revealed via the words out of his own mouth and his own behaviors, while Clinton’s shortcomings are part of the narrative of the Republican Party who argues she is hiding something.  After months and months of hearings and investigations no agency has found any evidence that merits the prosecution of Clinton.  And yet the narrative has become so strong as to be believed by many.

I am oh so worried about this election, not because of whomever the winner is, but because this election will more than anything in recent history reveal America’s core values.  A Trump victory will send a loud and clear message regarding civil rights, inequality of wealth, consumer oriented protection agencies like OSHA, Office of Civil Rights, FDA, etc.  Those agencies will be abandoned while taxes on the wealthy will decrease.  Trump has said he will end the “monopoly” of public education.  Holy Cow.  It will also say that what Trump has said and done is forgivable, and perhaps worse, supportable.


The mere fact that the candidates appear to be running neck-and-neck down to the wire is as discouraging a piece of news as I have heard in a long time.  It should never have been close.  It should never have been Trump.  The fact that it is both is the scariest thing I can think of on Halloween.

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Politically Correct is Morally Correct

It has been difficult for me to understand much of what is happening politically and socially in our nation right now.  In so many ways I am naive.  But with the latest discussion regarding Trump’s comments about women some of the fog in my mind has cleared.

My childhood included seeing three restrooms and two water fountains everywhere I went:  Men, women and colored, White and Colored.  I grew up in the Ozzie and Harriet world.  I grew up when every elected official south of the Mason Dixon line was a Democrat.  I grew up when smoking was cool.  My family did not own a TV until I was 8 years old and the shows were all black and white.  I grew up when the CEO and Congress were all men, almost all white men.  I grew up seeing the riots in Watts and at the Democratic convention in Chicago.  I grew up when there was both a draft and a war and women were not part of the effort except in voluntary support roles.  I grew up at a time when the locker room talk among high school boys and those men who did not mature beyond high school was similar to Trump’s comments.  I grew up at a time it was just assumed that women and Blacks were somehow inferior to white males.  I grew up in a time when people with special needs were ignored and kept at home.  I grew up in a time when being homosexual was a deep, dark secret.  I grew up in a time where using slang words for Muslims, Blacks and women was OK.  It was politically correct to use discriminatory language for any group that was perceived to be sub-white male:  wet-backs, niggers, fags, retards, pussies, camel jocks, and on and on.

I am naive in that I thought as a nation, as a pool of human beings, we had progressed beyond the acceptance of such nonsense in the 1950’s through the confrontation of such nonsense in the 1960’s to a world of accepting diversity, to a world where we all recognize that every race, every ethnic group, both genders, and people of various sexual preferences have the potential to make major, positive contributions to our world.  Contributions that are not grounded in characteristics determined at birth and religious belief or absence thereof, and determined by zip code.  More than that, I thought we had reached a time when we recognized the inherent worth of humanity.  I have been foolishly wrong.

I get it now when Trump says “Make America Great Again.”  He wants to return to the time when white men ruled and there was no such thing as being politically correct.  He can wave his arm and make derogatory remarks about all women and individual women and that should be OK.  He can wave his arm and make generalized statements regarding immigrants to this country.  He can mock people with special needs.  He can wave his arm and make generalized statements about any group that in his 1950’s mind merits a slang term. 

Political correctness, that is eliminating bias and discrimination from our speech and our behavior, is in fact moral correctness.  If one believes we can prejudge entire groups of human beings and lump them under some derogatory heading, then one feels freed from both political correctness and moral correctness.  And people who still harbor those old 1950’s notions that were part of our heritage at the time have not matured socially or morally.  Women did not earn the right to vote until 1920, and even then the vote was very close.  It was not until 1900 that women throughout the nation could own property separate from their husbands.  Blacks earned the right to vote in 1870, 50 years before women.  It has always been assumed in this nation that white males, especially white males who own property, have the right to vote and control.  Political correctness is our effort to express our moral correctness.  Any effort to return to the days of discriminatory language and behavior is, by definition morally wrong.

I hear pundits including women saying ignore Trump’s comments in all these areas.  Boys will be boys.  Poppycock and balderdash.  To forgive Trump is to sink to a moral depth we should have escaped by now.  To forgive Trump is to return to the time where discrimination was politically acceptable.  Such a regression is immoral.  It represents a culture and belief system that is immoral.  It represents our bigoted childhood which we should have abandoned long ago.  It should never, ever be the model we wish to re-establish.  It is wrong.


So, if it bothers you that I carefully edit my language to exclude discriminatory nouns and adjectives it is because I believe human beings regardless of characteristics deserve our respect.  Anything we say or do that implies some humans are inferior to or subordinate to other human beings is morally wrong.  Political correctness is moral correctness.  Abandoning that is not returning to a time of greatness.  It is sinking to a depth of moral morass from which we should have escaped to higher ground long ago.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Obama is a god

We are experiencing trying times.  Law enforcement officers are shot on the job.  Horrible, scary events that should never happen.  Unarmed men and women are shot by police.  Horrible, scary events that should never happen.  We see all this as a new problem.  It is not.  We have had separate but unequal races in this country for generations.  More of one race in prison.  More of one race dies via gunshot wounds.  More of one race experiences unemployment.  More of one race in colleges.  More of one race teaching in the classrooms.  More of one race in law enforcement.  We are lopsided.  We can scream all day that these differences are due to the behaviors of one race more than another.  Perhaps.  But we should be screaming that we must stop judging people by skin pigment, hair style, holes poked in their bodies, ink injected under their skin, and the relationship between their belly buttons and the top of their pants.  (I have contended all along that if teenage girls simply laughed at and refused to date any teenage boy who allowed his underwear to show above his belt the fad would disappear quickly.)

The problems are huge, both races have responsibilities.  Both races have tough steps to take to fix it because both races must modify their culture and their beliefs to end the disparity in data that confirms one race is treated differently and/or behaves differently than another.  That will be very hard.  Or so I thought.

Until I listened to my conservative friends.  Perhaps I should say my very conservative friends.  My moderately conservative friends and my liberal friends are not promoting the same message.  Just those folks on the far right.  Only they have seen the light.  And here is what they are saying.

The violence in our country is Obama’s fault.  Shooting police officers is Obama’s fault.  Increased racial tension is Obama’s fault.  Still no affordable universal health insurance is Obama’s fault.  Proliferation of semi-automatic rifles is Obama’s fault.  Probably sexual harassment at Fox News is Obama’s fault.  He caused it all.  He did it.  He is the villain!

If they are right, then Obama is God.  I have been praying to God to stop the violence, but Obama still made it happen.  I have been praying to God to stop senseless shootings of suspects and police, but Obama still made it happen.  Therefore I guess I should agree with my conservative friends that not only is Obama at fault, he is more powerful than we ever imagined.  More powerful than the god I followed.  It is time to worship Obama, pray to Obama, and ask him please to stop all the violence, all the killings.  If he caused it, he can stop it.  I am so surprised that enterprising right wingers have not marched out evidence of Obama’s deity status which should be easier for them to get than his birth certificate, and establish the Church of Obama, tax free. 

Why, now that we know Obama is a god the violence in France must be his fault too!  In fact, violence everywhere must be his doing.  Intolerance of other races everywhere must be his fault too!  Even global warming must be his fault. 


Yes dear conservatives, such a powerful deity merits our awe and respect.  Thank you for enlightening me.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Deplorables?

Clinton has ignited a lot of discussion this week identifying some Trump supporters as "Deplorables."  I disagree with Hillary.  The people, the human beings, that support Trump cannot be deplorable by definition.  However, they can hold deplorable beliefs and deplorable attitudes that inspire deplorable behaviors.  They carry the cancers that are eating away at our culture and I wish I knew the cure.  I have spoken to this issue already and re-post that piece from May of this year.  (At the time I wrote this piece I chose "cancer" as my metaphor for the diseases carried via the beliefs some hold.  Had I written it today I would have used STD's because if Trump is elected and institutes his vitriol we will all get screwed and thereby get sick.)

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Trump Metastasizes Cultural Cancers

Donald Trump has secured the number of Republican delegates to become the Republican nominee for President of the United States.  Wow.  Trump could be our next President.  If so, I believe our nation will survive.  However, I believe we will do an about face on the march to a healthier nation, a better nation, a world leader, and a nation that stands for what is right.  We would become a sick nation if Trump were elected President.  I am aghast that so many do not see this.  Or perhaps it is not that so many do not see it, it is that so many want to endorse and spread the diseases Trump promotes.  I will use the term cultural cancers to attempt to capture the nature of those diseases.  Diseases that make us weak and make us sick.

But before that, we need to discuss the attributes of a healthy national culture.  As I think about America I want a nation of people who value diversity.  People who do not discriminate based on any variable that is determined at birth including gender, sexual preference, gender identity, race, and ethnicity.  I picture a nation where people do not discriminate based on many attributes that are self-selected such as religious preference, hair color, addictions and weight.  I picture a nation of people who promote and protect the minority, the underdog, knowing that God does not make junk.  I picture a nation of people who stand for justice, who do not shoot from the hip, who do not judge at first glance, and who respect the law and the peacekeepers.  I picture a nation of people who are positive, open, welcoming and free of fear.  I picture a nation of people who are generous to all who are in need whether they are our own or are victims abroad.  I picture a nation where protecting your rights means more to me than implementing my beliefs in law.  I picture a nation of people who value the arts, creativity, knowledge and learning.  I picture a nation of people who understand that by protecting industries such oil and guns that we are hurting everyone and are spreading cancers.  I picture a nation where human beings mean more than wealth accumulation.  I picture a nation where the people know that we should judge our success by the fate and status of the least among us.  And I picture a nation who will stand for democracy and human rights abroad.  Those are attributes of a healthy culture and a culture where I would want to live.

But cultures can be sick, can be cancerous.  The cancers I fear in our culture are those attributes that are the antithesis of those listed above.  Discrimination, prejudice in any form is a cancer.  Insistence that my way is the right way is a cancer.  Demanding that my religious beliefs entitle me to discriminate, to judge, to damn others and demanding that such beliefs whatever they are become the law of the land.  Believing that building walls against other human beings based on geography and damning other human beings based on religious belief is a good thing.  It is not.  It is a cancerous belief.  Promoting strategies that help those who need it the least at the expense of those who need it the most is cancerous.  Promoting industries that are resulting in untold deaths and untold damages to our planet is cancerous.  Promoting fear to attain power is a cancer.  Promoting ignorance rather than knowledge is cancerous.  Promoting my way of thinking by attacking others is a cancer.  Sending the message that self-service and self-defense are superior to serving and defending others is a cancer.

You will likely not agree with everything I have listed both healthy and cancerous.  But those are my beliefs.  In a healthy culture it will be OK for me to have those beliefs and I will not merit assault.  Our culture grows ill if we attack folks with differing beliefs.

Given all that, Donald Trump is not promoting the attributes that I believe would make our nation healthier, happier and better.  He is promoting the spread of cancerous beliefs.  From his views of women, Mexicans, Muslims, the families of terrorists, foreign policy, gun accessibility and wealth accumulation he is metastasizing cancer in our national body.  It is my fervent hope that enough Americans see what Trump represents, rejects those notions, and when those Americans go to the polls in November they opt to stop the spread of cancers.


How do we stop promoting the spread of such cancers?  I do not believe chemotherapy will work.  Drinking more scotch will not make him go away.  It is going to take surgical amputation.  Such amputation is only accomplished by thoughtful educated voters.  This fall, please amputate the cancer.

Monday, September 12, 2016

Ambition and Integrity

Ambition.  The desire to get more, have more, rise higher, and improve one’s status and prestige and power.  A subset of ambition is a high sense of competition.  Most folks believe that people do not become CEO’s, governors, presidents, school superintendents, etc. without at least some detectable amount of ambition in their composition.  I see it clearly in Trump and clearly in Clinton.  That drive to excel, to be the alpha, to be the boss, to control, to be on top is very near the surface in both these candidates.  I have seen it very clearly in many of the educators I have worked with, especially administrators.

Integrity.  The commitment to do what is right, to tell the truth, to do no harm to any other, to honor and serve humanity.  Most folks believe that people do not become teachers, nurses, preachers, social workers, or counselors without a detectable amount of integrity in their composition.  I have seen it clearly in many of my fellow church members, in my fellow educators, especially teachers.  That drive to serve, to stand for what is best in all of humanity, to make lives of others better, and to do so with humility is near the surface in the folks we know who have integrity.

So my query is, can one have both ambition and integrity?  I am not so sure.

Among other activities I was in the band in high school.  I played the clarinet.  I loved playing in the band, I loved knowing I was a part of something bigger, something beautiful.  I really did not care about competition with fellow band members, I cared about the sound we were making together.  I sat first chair, placed there by an audition everyone took at the beginning of school.  The band director placed us based on our musicality and technical skill.  Deanie was second chair.  She was very competitive and felt from the beginning that she should have been first chair.  I did not care, first chair and second chair played the same music.  So after a couple of weeks of her loud sighs and deep moans, and what appeared to be real joy on her part when I missed a note or a beat, I asked her if she would really like to be first chair.  She said “yes.”  I said it was OK with me, and the next day when we walked into band Deanie sat first chair and I sat second chair.  My role in the band had not changed, my music had not changed, but I had won a new friend.  Deanie was all over herself thanking me.  The director came in and rehearsal started.  Suddenly he stopped and pointed out that Deanie and I were not sitting in our assignment chairs.  I told him that I had told Deanie she could be first chair, I did not care.  The director blew up and called us both in his office.  

His complaint was that he will make all chair decisions and he did not want anyone in his band who did not have the desire to improve.  I told him I had taken private lessons since 6th grade, I practiced at least an hour each night, and I was fully aware that I was the best in the section, and that improving my ability to play the clarinet was very important to me, but that where I sat did not matter to me.  He blew up and asked me to leave the band.  I packed up my instrument, grabbed my books and went to the counselor to have my schedule changed, never again to play the clarinet or perform or march with the band.  And though I had been all region in band and won numerous UIL solo and ensemble awards, I was done.  I was re-assigned to speech and debate, and two years later won the state debate competition and oratory competition.  If there is competition someone wins and someone loses.  I had a great time in band and a great time in speech and debate.  The band director lost because he was so full of ambition and competition that he could not relinquish control.  He could not even picture making a decision for the greater good even if it meant self-sacrifice.

I have watched parents at little league games, boys and girls, football, baseball, softball; and parents of integrity regarding their kids in most settings become ambitious monsters if they believe their child has somehow been slighted, or has not been given enough playing time, or someone is picking on them, etc..  How many videos of fights at little league games do we have to watch to see ambition blinding reason.  When the desire to be the best at any cost drives our ambition, then we are willing to sacrifice even the most fundamental rules of human interaction to have our way.

I have seen parents of school children verbally assault school employees because they wanted something special for their kids.  Usually they could not recognize that universal fairness eliminates special treatment.  In cases of unusual needs, special treatment is warranted, but not because the parent perceives his or her kid to be gifted or somehow immune to the rules everyone else is asked to follow.  Such parents’ ambition for their kids blinds them to the integrity incumbent in any group setting.

I worked for 19 years in a Houston school district.  I had many roles from campus to central office leadership positions.  One weekend the superintendent, who was mad at one of us on the executive director level, re-assigned all of us by simply rotating executive directors from their current job to someone else’ job.  I ended assigned to take the job of a woman who loved program evaluation and assessment.  I would hate that job.  She was assigned to elementary instruction, and she hated that job.  My best friend was bumped from leading secondary instruction to staff development.  I could not remain in a system that advocated collaborative decision making, advocated involving the participants in decisions if the decisions affected them, and advocated everyone working in an area of their own interest while behind the scenes people were moved like pawns with no consultation or involvement.  I quit.  So did a dear friend who was moved to staff development.  She was most hurt by all of this and I could not tolerate such.  Ever since, I have watched the overly ambitious accept jobs at the expense of others, somehow rationalizing that if it is good for them it must be good. No, to accept a position that requires someone else who is competent to leave what they love is the epitome of high ambition and low integrity.  People of integrity would recognize what the system must value to effect such a change and leave that system.  I did.  Do no harm applies to others, not one’s self.

Through all the pain and agony and death and anger of 9/11 the only real joy was the unification of the citizens of this country, however brief, toward the same goals.  We honored first responders, those in the military, families who had lost loved ones, and stood in awe and celebration of individual self-sacrifice for the good of others.  Our definition of heroes changed. Heroes were now people of integrity.  They were not people of ambition.

I know that people of ambition tend to earn more money and sit in seats with greater power.   Or so it seems.  But for the rest of us working with or for people of ambition our respect drops substantially.  We most respect people who serve others more than self.  I am in shock every time I hear of a CEO getting a bonus while the company lays off workers.  There is no integrity in such a decision.  Only ambition. And any time someone tells you that they are the only one who can do it and that others are failures, it is an announcement of incredible ambition at the expense of integrity.  Any time a person’s list of accomplishments includes only those ventures that earned them more money or power they are not a person of integrity.  Give me a leader who strives if nothing else to do no harm.


So, I find it rare to see in any person an even balance of ambition and integrity.  When push comes to shove, people will jump either for self-service or service to others.  And in that jump we see their true colors.